Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Ireland's second republic



1. Legitimation of the "state" and the  Irish republic

Much of the readership of this blog is from outside Ireland, so a little history will help. In the 19th century, as soon as the voting franchise was extended to catholics, the Irish nation as a whole repeatedly voted for a limited form of autonomy called “Home rule”. While prime minister, Gladstone managed to steer a “Home rule” bill through the commons, only to see the House of Lords reject it.

So matters remained until WW1, when “Home rule” was attenuated to include only the 26 counties. Even this bill was suspended, with the Irish Parliamentary Party/Nationalist Party (IPP) parliamentarians in London expected to support conscription of the Irish as a quid pro quo. That political tightrope act proved unsustainable, and a very marginal group of socialists and Fenians declared a republic in 1916. Their revolt was clearly quixotic,and is described in all its chaos by the Nobellist Vargas Llosa's recent “El sueno del celta”;

Yet the point had been made; Irish people were willing to fight and die for the proclamation of a republic that extended the voting franchise to women, was non-sectarian and claimed ownership of the resources of Ireland for the Irish people. It is fair to say that these principles remain the legitimately held aspirations of the great majority of Irish people today. They are what the Irish successfully fought for in the brilliantly executed guerrilla war that so inspired the 20the century colonies to do likewise; they are also the touchstone of legitimacy of the Irish state. One argument here is that this version of the state as it currently operates is therefore illegitimate

In 1918 an election was held under British law; Sinn Fein won over 70% of the seats. Instead of trotting off to Whitehall/London, they formed an autonomous parliament of the Irish republic as voted for by the people;


This assembly of the republic was proscribed by the British and its successor had a similarly anomalous being;


Eventually, after a bitterly fought civil war, the “free state” was created, the republic was not included,


Unlike the British, the Irish had a written constitution, edited by Whitehall



The classic republican argument is that the “free state” was created under threat of military invasion by Britain and that therefore the second Dail remains in existence as the legitimate government of Ireland, held in trust by the army council of the IRA until full elections again are held. . The Anglo-Irishman Richard Barton, who was one of the treaty negotiators and had no reason to lie, attested that such a threat was indeed uttered by Lloyd George, specifically “war within three days”

The “free state” made several attempts to resolve the situation before the capitulation that we are about to describe. One was the 1937 constitution; the other was the 1948 declaration of a republic, a declaration that was proscribed by the British in 1922 but would probably have averted the Civil war had it been done then. There possibly would have been less bloodshed on the island in the 70 subsequent years had this 1922 declaration taken place

A pathological dynamic, therefore has historically obtained. It started when the party that became Fianna fail set up what was effectively an internal government in exile after the civil war. They had government ministries in this fantasy league, unlike their successors from 1938 onwards, which were strictly military in effect. The first such, with impeccable timing, declared war on Britain in 1939; the subsequent 1950's border campaign was as bad.

Most recently. Gerry Adams' IRA renounced their claim on sovereignty and joined the parliament in both parts of Ireland. It is fair to suggest that the British patronage of Adams and his ilk was due to fear of Marxists like Seamus Costello with their more effective paramilitaries, rather than love of Gerry.


2. The nullification of Ireland's national territory

In 1937, on the eve of WW2, with an armed neighbor beside it staking claim over some of the same territory, and after centuries of genocide and dispossession, the Irish people voted for this simple proposition;

Article 2
The national territory consists of the whole island of Ireland, its islands and the territorial seas.”
In 1938, as we've seen, the IRA lost patience and claimed jurisdiction over the whole island in the name of the 1916 republic. This ended in the 1969-1997 disaster; what was to come, I argue, was the conscious destruction of the Irish people as an identifiable ethnic group; in short, cultural genocide. First, in an appallingly written document, the national territory was gotten rid of;




The new Article 2

“It is the entitlement and birthright of every person born in the island of Ireland, which includes its islands and seas, to be part of the Irish Nation. That is also the entitlement of all persons otherwise qualified in accordance with law to be citizens of Ireland. Furthermore, the Irish nation cherishes its special affinity with people of Irish ancestry living abroad who share its cultural identity and heritage.
The new Article 3
  1. It is the firm will of the Irish Nation, in harmony and friendship, to unite all the people who share the territory of the island of Ireland, in all the diversity of their identities and traditions, recognising that a united Ireland shall be brought about only by peaceful means with the consent of a majority of the people, democratically expressed, in both jurisdictions in the island. Until then, the laws enacted by the Parliament established by this Constitution shall have the like area and extent of application as the laws enacted by the Parliament[2] that existed immediately before the coming into operation of this Constitution.
  2. Institutions with executive powers and functions that are shared between those jurisdictions may be established by their respective responsible authorities for stated purposes and may exercise powers and functions in respect of all or any part of the island. “


So there was to be no national territory; power lay in new bodies with officials unelected locally allowed to lay down the law. Moreover, by 2004 article 2 was rejected by 80% of the electorate, who insisted - pace, Leopold Bloom - that Irishness was more than just being born there

3. A new republic and reconciliation tribunal

Consequently, we now have two claimants on the republic;

  1. The current internationally-accepted government, the successor to the “free state”
  2. The army council of the IRA, which is not recognized internationally and has few supporters even in Ireland

It is the thesis of this post that these claims have equal moral and political validity. Moreover, the Free state has become so inimical to the interests of Irish people that there a very strong argument for the declaration of a new republic, even before putting it to the Irish people as a political movement and a referendum.

International accreditation of the “free state” brings with it a heavy burden, both financial and political.In particular, we are told that we owe abut $100 billion; in effect, the terms post 1998 are those given to Germany by the allies after WW1 and WW2. 
What is being proposed here, therefore, is a tribunal subsequent to the coming into force of the constitution of the new republic that examines crimes committed against Ireland under the flag of the old republic. There is no doubt that the banksters who successfully sought to defraud the Irish exchequer in order to keep their scam going for just a few months longer should be in jail, nor is there any doubt that the “free state” will not prosecute them;


Nor is there any doubt that the succession of minsters (Burke, ahern and now Rabbitte) who have given away our fossil fuels are in violation of article 10 of the onstitution;

“All natural resources, including the air and all forms of potential energy, within the jurisdiction of the Parliament and Government established by this Constitution and all royalties and franchises within that jurisdiction belong to the State subject to all estates and interests therein for the time being lawfully vested in any person or body. “

Yet the situation is clearer still. This government sees itself as a tool of the international financial community, rather than an entity resolved to protect the Irish people, as Merkel is obliged to do. They foster massive emigration of the Irish, and immigration of unskilled foreigners. In particular, the minister for finance announced that we e took one for the team, where this team is clearly not Ireland;


The deputy PM reports details of internal party strategy to his manager in the Dublin US embassy. Small wonder they went on openly to try and teal Irish passports and refuse visas to leading Irish writers, as my (in press) “Ireland in crisis” shows;


The PM himself is frighteningly stupid, ignorant, and ill-advised;



More to the point, as I have copiously documented elsewhere, this version of the Irish state has suspended the rule of law as it suits to destroy Irish ethnic musicians, and put the universities outside any statutory control. My solution has been simple; create an alternative university and open science sites. Indeed, this should be the leitmotif; create alternative institutions using the web.

The Irish state attempts to control things using mechanisms that are pre-Gutenberg, let alone the internet. This colonial administration has in fact allowed Irish passports themselves to become unsafe as the Mossad developed an unhealthy obsessions with them. In fact, it produces nothing of any benefit to an intelligent and sensitive human being

Law is used in Ireland almost solely as an instrument to cement the grip of a self-appointed elite on power. In general, then, the impetus that gave the free state some traction on the notion of the republic and legality has been spent

Yet there is no point in redoing the IRA trick. What seems to make sense is to declare a new republic, and to abide by the laws of the free state in a minimal fashion. As Iceland has demonstrated with bands like “Of Monsters and Men”, there are massive opportunities for a resource-rich state like Ireland that frees itself from the death-grip of the banksters .

Saturday, July 13, 2013

Edward Snowden, Barrett Brown, Bradley Manning; restoring America's honor



It is at least plausible that we are living in a continued coup attempt by an international plutocracy/self-appointed elite. Their get-togethers are well-known; Davos, G8, G20 and so on. The methodology varies; military invasions have ended up in fiasco, but the idea of destroying the protections engendered through the Church congressional hearings in the 1970's has persisted. Remarkably, the team that surrounded the president as he defended Colby's spooks at the time – Rumsfeld, Cheney, Greenspan et al – staged a comeback for the brief ride to power of the neocons.

A second theme has been the financialization of the economy and the attempt to put finance on an irrevocable math basis. This too ended in fiasco in 2008; the response was to create a fictitious president from whole cloth – and if Obama is who he says he is I'll eat my Irish passport – and to sneak in massive subsidies to these failed enterprises, evict people from their homes, and allow Obama do his MLK impersonations to ensure wealthy liberal people still felt good about themselves. For the record, this Dow bubble will end before Jan 014 as china collapses. Then they will repeat the Obama trick

A thrid theme has been the sheer mediocrity – nay, incompetence in many cases – of this tide of “innovation”. Had facebook been presented to me as a junior thesis, I would have given it a bare pass; it would have failed as a senior thesis. It is a matter of public record that Zuckerberg got his initial $13 million funding from a CIA affiliate called Accel partners after he revealed a willingness to share passwords and other private info from these “dumb fucks” as he calls his 1 billion + members;

and what happened to myspace?

The "social network" movie may best be seen as disinformation with the Winkelvoss twins perhaps  used as scapegoats to provide a good  if inaccurate story.

 It is also a matter of public record that Google uses the ancient “Power method”, channeled through Katz ranking, for its page rank. It is also BS to posit that they “hooked 200 computers together" etc; in fact they used the same data repository as Yahoo before their unexpected rise. They too have been partly CIA-funded.  Larry Ellison's owm Wiki entry goes  "One of his projects was a database for the CIA, which he named "Oracle"' !As for Microsoft, check the  Guardian

they are all at it

Given how trivial most of these technologies are, even as small a country like Ireland can produce a competitor that guarantees privacy.

Finally, we come to the extreme violence with which the USA dispossessed the natives. The rest of the world is beginning to experience this, with theft of Irish passports (not edible but useful; see my “Ireland in Crisis” book, in press), combined with blocking off air space to presidents, spying on friendly countries, and much else being used by the spookocracy. Yet there are fatal flaws in their plan.

One is that government salaries are not high enough to hire the really good tech people. So they end up outsourcing the tech work to Stratfor, who do not have a chance against Anonymous et al; there is prima facie evidence that elements in the FBI helped Anonymous, perhaps fearing for their jobs. The second is the honesty, openness and decency that characterizes much of American society

Edward Snowden and Barrett Brown epitomize this; yet Bradley Manning, a tortured soul, has had the greatest impact. None have been offered due process in a country whose history of genocide requires that it must save itself by offering such. We finally found how we were being governed, and watched. They are just the first three; this system of government in the name of openness but actually steeped in deceit and invasion of privacy is unstable. I for one am very hopeful that we can change things.

It will probably be necessary for many of us to get out of the USA if our cars (or bikes in my case) start to malfunction like  Michael Hastings';

Attending Obama's inaugration does not help

Finally, I have little doubt that this harmless and obscure blog is being monitored. It is for the same reason as gmail keeps changing and Facebook is doing linguistics "research" to process text automatically ; overstaffing in the spookocracy as in these otherwise boring companies.


PS (Aug 2014)The  Dow is indeed down for this year. Do not follow this blog for investment advice!

QE ends this Fall.........

Saturday, July 6, 2013

We are the 99%...and the Irish government will ignore us, yet again

It is difficult to convey to those outside Ireland what exact role the Irish Times plays in Irish public life. There is a viewpoint that it shapes policy through the Labor party, the tail (8% in the latest poll) wagging the dog in government. Perhaps the best analogy is to consider the impact the NY Times might have had during its period of boosting the Iraq war had its circulation been 8 million, as distinct from 2 million with the wind behind it. In that vein, it is as well to mention that many of the IT's key staff are Americans from colleges in the boonies,

In my personal experience, the Irish Times has not hesitated to inflate property prices, boost the failed Medialab project, attack academic tenure, savage brilliant and well-meaning artists (two of whom - Pete A and Sean O Riada - died after attacks in the Times)  and libel at will. So it is quite a moment when one of its pet projects, the boosting of abortion, does not pass the smell test after it publishes repeated opinion polls stating that the Irish wanted abortion.

In particular, if 75% are for abortion as these "surveys" indicate,why is it that the pro-life people outnumbered the pro-abortion protesters 99+:1 even in the Times' garbled report;

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/approximately-35-000-join-dublin-anti-abortion-rally-1.1455537

It would be interesting to see what Times contacts have already lucrative contracts for harvesting of stem cells and so on from aborted fetuses. After all, the Times played a major role in condemning the Irish economy through its property supplement being backed by Op-ed cheerleaders giving "objective" analyses.

Finally, I repeat my hypothesis that the current onset of abortion mania arose from a botched  DIY abortion attempted on a female fetus by an Indian couple in Ireland, together with her parents, Should they proceed with the civil case, this will likely come out. There are currently 800,00 abortions of female fetuses per year in India, with an imbalance of (up to age 6 alone) fully 7 million more males than females.

One of the classical ways to get sepsis is through this procedure;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-induced_abortion

12/7/13 - another fine mess

The legislation just passed the lower house. For non-Irish readers, that may come as something of a relief. the Savita case cannot happen again, right? In fact, this legislation does not even pretend to tackle such cases; sepsis is still very poorly understood and thousands die of it every week in the USA


10th most prevalent cause of death

Ireland's new lawgives effect to a 1992 supreme court judgement that makes Kermit Gosnell's activities legal;

American Mengele


 If a woman, 9 months pregnant,  whose waters have broken can prove that she is "at risk' of suicide, the baby must be terminated. This is the case if as Gosnell charmingly put it, the baby can be walked to the bus stop

So what is going on? the government has lost 5 of its parlimantary party, including its brightest star Ms Creighton, and Fine Gael will lose more;

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/abortion-bill-passed-29413834.html

It is clear what happened; death of sympathetic Indian woman, stoke the flames, the usual lies in the irish times. But this legislation?

The most plausible explanation is that this is part of the secret programme for government, arranged with gilmore who is conveniently absent in the USA which, as wikileaks has shown gives him his instructions.

Finally, the supreme court in Ireland ruled a generation ago that , the north-eastern corner was part of the national territory; no effort was made to implement this, for some reason. In 1998, 97% of the people voted to have NO national territory............


PS From Isaacson's biography of Steve Jobs, who was adopted. P254;

"I'm glad I didn't end up as an abortion"

Jobs subsequently made friends with his biological mother



Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Science Foundation Ireland and the CIA

We are about to enter a period wherein there will be an epidemic of anti-American sentiment even among countries and individuals normally well-disposed to the USA. The cold war surveillance apparatus should have been attenuated from 1990; instead, it has metastasized into something used to spy on friends of the USA, as Germany is pointing out.

That's not my main concern here. It is rather a very odd coincidence between the stated goals of the CIA's tech outreach company (In-Q-tel) and Science Foundation Ireland (SFI). The latter was set up over a decade ago without any serious consultation   - particularly given the massive budget of about $1 billion. It is fair to say that SFI has been controversial; indeed there are schools of opinion that it is essentially an even more grotesque version of the Medilab debacle.

Why keep it going? Let's look at its foci per

http://www.sfi.ie/about/

essentially they are  biotech and info tech.

These are precisely the same as the CIA's off shoot;

http://www.iqt.org/portfolio/practices.html


with the proviso that energy will be handled by the DOE

The apparently insane and wasteful behavior by successive Irish govts now makes some sense; it is less mad than evil

For the record, this is an open science model which I think should be adopted in Ireland, both as an education program that all science  PhD  students should do and as a general open science approach with a list of the resources appended;

http://universityofireland.com/m-sc-in-interdisciplinary-studies/



  • Biotechnology (BIO)
  • Information and communications technology (ICT)
  • Sustainable energy and energy-efficient technologies (ENERGY)
  • - See more at: http://www.sfi.ie/about/#sthash.ThHnkAUb.dpuf

  • Biotechnology (BIO)
  • Information and communications technology (ICT)
  • Sustainable energy and energy-efficient technologies (ENERGY)
  • - See more at: http://www.sfi.ie/about/#sthash.ThHnkAUb.dpuf

  • Biotechnology (BIO)
  • Information and communications technology (ICT)
  • Sustainable energy and energy-efficient technologies (ENERGY)
  • - See more at: http://www.sfi.ie/about/#sthash.ThHnkAUb.dpuf


    Sunday, June 30, 2013

    Anglo Irish Bank; why Ireland's new normal may not take after all




    Last week, the world gained an insight into the " new normal" in Ireland. It is essentially a refusal to prosecute any major criminal behaviour if any such behaviour has demonstrable links with people still in the Irish establishment. What is fed to the Irish people is a set of school morality plays and patronizing moral speeches from on high;



    http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/president-higgins-says-anglo-tapes-highlight-greedy-attitudes-29384062.html



    So it went for the recent abortion case, where a tribunal of inquiry was rigged and nobody mentioned that sepsis is so poorly understood that tens of thousands (few of them pregnant)  die each year from it in the USA. Moreover, the theft in the music business, wherein a state agency had sold bootlegs of Irish artists and in so doing destroyed a whole generation of musicians; has gone unpunished even after a US Federal court case revealed the scam and resulted in victory for the musicians; ;

    Millions of bootleg tracks by Irish musicians sold through Walmart


    In short, as the preceding post demonstrates for the universities, there is no protection for anyone in Ireland against fraud. The new normal is impunity for the establishment. My own solution has been to set up an educational institution in which students can do world-class courses in freedom. however, there are individuals much better placed than me to put pressure on the Irish establishment, and one such is Angela Merkel, the source of the largesse that keeps the current Irish colonial administration in power. she has declared what happened a threat to democracy


    Indeed, it clearly is;

    http://www.independent.ie/blog/listen-to-the-full-anglo-recordings-29367462.html



    What we know for sure is that



    1. Anglo's John Bowe deliberately  misled the Irish Central Bank into giving E7 billion of taxpayers' money. Had he told the truth, Ireland might still be an economically sovereign state;



    2. The Irish cops, who probably are the source of these tapes, knew about this 4 years ago;



    3. No prosecution has been done and none proposed, beyond a token and much -delayed attempt to prosecute minor players for cooking the books, a slap on the wrist affair, a school play,  that infuriated the judge assigned to it as the director of corporate enforcement repeatedly held things up

    So what will happen? Well,  it is clear that we were never meant to hear those tapes. Indeed, the delay in and obstruction of prosecution may primarily have been about preventing us from hearing them. However, Ireland's MO is now in the court of world opinion. That court is being less understanding and I ask you to consider that to be perhaps not such a bad thing.



    Tuesday, June 11, 2013

    The state as weapon against its citizens; autonomous statutory responsibilities



    The glory neocon years witnessed many sinister emanations from think-tanks. I feature the political science of these in my recent book as on my UC Berkeley conference proceedings of “Ireland in crisis” (in press, CSP);




    While the Iraq war – recently described in Harper's magazine as a failed pour encourager les autres move by Wofowitz – was the worst, others were infinitely more subtle. The elision of civil society and the total corporate takeover of the state were to be simultaneous. So in Ireland music was to be controlled through a “rights” organization called IMRO that relentlessly tightened its grip over venues - some of which closed partially because IMRO charged too much after its being given a state monopoly in a corrupt fashion – and musicians, who without any meeting of minds handed all their IP over.

    What happened in the Irish universities was the flip side; allowing a state body behave outside the law. You can find my original commentary here;


    What is of interest is how the ASR doctrine works out in terms of abuse of students of staff, and the budget - a list of Dail proceedings is given below. We can also take it straight from the horse;s mouth;



    The Universities Act, 1997 is the first comprehensive legislation that affects all seven
    universities in the State. The Act sets out the relationship between the State and the
    universities. It confers autonomous statutory responsibilities on universities in relation
    to the day-to-day management of their affairs, designates modes of accountability and
    strategic planning procedures for quality assurance, while respecting the academic
    autonomy of the universities. The Regional Technical Colleges Act, 1992 and the
    Dublin Institute of Technology Act, 1992 provide autonomy to the Institutes of
    Technology within an overall policy, budgetary and quality assurance framework
    designed to ensure full accountability”


    This is just balderdash. It has also turned out to be too cute by half, a demonstration of why the Irish state cannot be trusted to run universities. My response was to register universityofireland.com as a joke; when the situation went beyond parody, it became clear that a rival institution that protest scholars (and the taxpayers' money) will be a very healthy addition.

    I end with three exemplification of our homegrown Wolfowitz doctrine;







    I Students(Gogarty's Parliamentary questions -Pqs)





    193.  Mr. Gogarty  Information on Paul Nicholas Gogarty  Zoom on Paul Nicholas Gogarty   asked the Minister for Education and Science  Information on Noel Dempsey  Zoom on Noel Dempsey   if the autonomous responsibilities delegated to universities under the Universities Act 1997 means they can effectively obey the laws of the land when it suits them. [14004/03]
      194.  Mr. Gogarty  Information on Paul Nicholas Gogarty  Zoom on Paul Nicholas Gogarty   asked the Minister for Education and Science  Information on Noel Dempsey  Zoom on Noel Dempsey   if his attention has been drawn to the fact that SIPTU has called a vote of no confidence in the human resources department at DCU; and if his Department intends to monitor the ongoing breakdown in staff relations and disputes over non-compliance with the Universities Act 1997. [14005/03]
      195.  Mr. Gogarty  Information on Paul Nicholas Gogarty  Zoom on Paul Nicholas Gogarty   asked the Minister for Education and Science  Information on Noel Dempsey  Zoom on Noel Dempsey   the reason he refuses to intervene in documented cases of intimidation and bribery of students, financial irregularities and an unfair dismissal as upheld by a rights commissioner, when it is obvious that DCU management's undertakings to engage with these serious issues have not been carried out. [14006/03]
      196.  Mr. Gogarty  Information on Paul Nicholas Gogarty  Zoom on Paul Nicholas Gogarty   asked the Minister for Education and Science  Information on Noel Dempsey  Zoom on Noel Dempsey   if his attention has been drawn to a case (details supplied); if there is action he can take in such cases; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14007/03]
    Minister for Education and Science (Mr. N. Dempsey): Information on Noel Dempsey  Zoom on Noel Dempsey  I propose to take Questions Nos. 193 to 196, inclusive, together.
    As the Deputy is aware, the Universities Act, 1997 confers autonomous statutory responsibilities on universities in the day to day management of their affairs. The conduct of staff relations is a matter for each university, in accordance with section 25 of the Act. In this context it would not be appropriate for me to comment on or intervene in operational management or individual disciplinary issues within a particular university such as the issue raised by the Deputy. However, I have been informed by the Higher Education Authority that the university in question is satisfied that it is properly discharging its responsibilities under the Universities Act 1997 and is conducting its affairs at all times in conformity with the laws of the land.

    PS Gogarty then changed sides.............and his notorious outburst was the day after the Cahill vs DCU verdict was announced, showing he'd aimed low and missed

    II Bullying of Staff


    Mr. N. Dempsey (Minister for Education): The Universities Act 1997 confers autonomous statutory responsibilities on universities in the day-to-day management of their affairs. My Department does not collect information on the issues raised by the Deputy. I have no proposals to carry out a study on bullying in Irish universities.

    Dáil Éireann 578 Written Answers Bullying in the Workplace.


    (Higgins Pqs)

    505. Mr. J. Higgins asked the Minister for Education and Science his plans to carry out a study of the extent of the problem of bullying in Irish universities. [1847/04]
      506. Mr. J. Higgins asked the Minister for Education and Science the total cost in legal fees for each university arising from Irish universities contesting cases of bullying through the courts between 1998-2003. [1848/04]
      507. Mr. J. Higgins asked the Minister for Education and Science the total number of cases relating to bullying involving staff or ex-staff of Irish universities brought through the courts between 1998-2003. [1849/04]
      508. Mr. J. Higgins asked the Minister for Education and Science the amount of money expended in out of court settlements between 1998-2003 arising from Irish universities contesting cases of bullying through the courts. [1850/04]
      509. Mr. J. Higgins asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of out of court settlements between 1998-2003 arising from Irish universities contesting cases of bullying through the courts. [1851/04]
    Ans

    [525]   Mr. N. Dempsey:I propose to take Questions Nos. 505 to 509, inclusive, together.
    The Universities Act 1997 confers autonomous statutory responsibilities on universities in the day-to-day management of their affairs. My Department does not collect information on the issues raised by the Deputy. I have no proposals to carry out a study on bullying in Irish universities.


    III De Money!!


    Seán Barrett (Ceann Comhairle; Dún Laoghaire, Fine Gael)
    Question 427: To ask the Minister for Education and Science if it is proposed to cut funding to a college (details supplied) in Dublin 2; his views on the consequences for the deaf community of such a reduction, in terms of teacher, university lecturer and sign language interpreter education, and educational delivery to deaf and hard of hearing students; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43360/08]
    Batt O'Keeffe (Minister, Department of Education and Science; Cork North West, Fianna Fail)
    The Universities Act, 1997, confers autonomous statutory responsibilities on universities in relation to the day to day management of their affairs and it is a matter for each university to manage their financial resources. The Universities receive a recurrent block grant from the Higher Education Authority (HEA), which is the statutory planning and development body for higher education and research in Ireland and is the funding authority for the universities.
    I understand from the HEA that in recent years the University referred to by the Deputy requested and received specific funding for the Centre referred to, as part of their overall recurrent grant. The University again made a request to the HEA for specific funding for the Centre for 2009. This request was recently agreed by the HEA and I understand that the Authority has notified the University of the position.
    With regards to general recurrent funding allocated by the HEA, it is a matter for each institution to determine how it is allocated internally and each institution may determine the internal disbursement of such funding and may allocate additional funding over and above that earmarked by the HEA if they so wish.

    Monday, May 27, 2013

    E-voting

    The following was published in California progress report, early 2007

    Irish E-voting--A Neocon Approach to be Avoided in California


    By Sean O Nuallain, Ph.D

    In early 2004, as now in late 2006, Ireland had many of the ingredients for that type of corporate governance we call fascism; a largely unaccountable police force (as the 2006 Morris report has attested), union of labor unions and employers under the auspices of the state in “ social partnership” agreements, a charismatic power-hungry prime minister (P. “Bertie” Ahern), and continual encroachment by a powerful state into aspects of civil society that started with the domestication of the trade unions. Massive privatizations were being contemplated, starting with the universities; of those actually achieved, that of the telecommunications sector has left Ireland in the third world with respect to broadband. The universities' privatizations were presaged by attempted manipulation of the quasi-Orwellian “social partnership” agreements to destroy academic tenure, with the death of at least one young academic as a result, and the destruction of academic freedom.

    From January to June 2004, Ireland through Ahern held both the presidency of the EU (which rotates) and that of the European Parliament, through a far-right elected parliamentarian. Having violated the practice of Irish neutrality in allowing both rendition flights and US troops through Shannon airport, one of the themes of the Irish dual presidency was to debauch the status of interlocutor of France/Germany and the Anglo-Saxon military alliance by unambiguous support by Ireland of the Iraq adventure. Dutch Nedap machines were chosen; a report was commissioned with political hacks and appointees forming a majority in the committee.

    However, problems began immediately. The initial reaction of the committee to the proposed e-voting process was so severe that the Dutch threatened libel action. The report, as released a month before the machines were meant to be used in European and local elections, is at www.cev.ie/htm/report/V02.pdf. It made clear that there was no debugged version of the software available even at that late stage, so voting proceeded in time-honored Irish fashion. This includes informal checking by “tallymen” from each party, and formal public counting by civil servants. The government was trounced, with Ahern's party suffering their worst result since entering the democratic realm from their wilderness years as the proto-IRA.

    An intriguing aspect of the proposed software is the use of Microsoft access as the database program, which few responsible consultants would have urged. Blackbox voting, among others, have shown how access can be exploited to set up a double accounting system, with election officials acting in good faith likely to be duped. After controversies about the storage of the machines on the property of his political supporters, Ahern ordered a second report which came out in 2006. It can be found at evoting.cs.may.ie/. Despite frantic attempts by Ahern to spin it as a resounding endorsement, on the extraordinary basis that it said that only the software was at fault, it is now clear that e-voting will not be used in our general election in 2007. When his popularity blips upward, as in October 2006, Ahern attempts to reintroduce the topic, with the current plan being use of e-voting in 2009 local and European elections, with storage by the army.

    Ironically, there are few complaints about the 2006 elections in California. The Irish case strongly suggests that e-voting is critical to the neocon agenda; it is vitally important to keep the pressure up so that the 2008 presidential elections are fair.

    Sean O Nuallain Ph.D. is an activist, academic, and musician. In 2003, he won a landmark judgment guaranteeing union representation for university staff in Ireland, and went on to co-found the musicians' union of Ireland. He runs a music company with his partner, the Gaelic jazz innovator Melanie O'Reilly, and recently joined the UC Berkeley faculty, from Stanford. The second edition of his book on activism, Being human (Intellect, 2004), was launched at Stanford in May, 2004; he is currently working on “Does Ireland matter?"