Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Ireland's second republic



1. Legitimation of the "state" and the  Irish republic

Much of the readership of this blog is from outside Ireland, so a little history will help. In the 19th century, as soon as the voting franchise was extended to catholics, the Irish nation as a whole repeatedly voted for a limited form of autonomy called “Home rule”. While prime minister, Gladstone managed to steer a “Home rule” bill through the commons, only to see the House of Lords reject it.

So matters remained until WW1, when “Home rule” was attenuated to include only the 26 counties. Even this bill was suspended, with the Irish Parliamentary Party/Nationalist Party (IPP) parliamentarians in London expected to support conscription of the Irish as a quid pro quo. That political tightrope act proved unsustainable, and a very marginal group of socialists and Fenians declared a republic in 1916. Their revolt was clearly quixotic,and is described in all its chaos by the Nobellist Vargas Llosa's recent “El sueno del celta”;

Yet the point had been made; Irish people were willing to fight and die for the proclamation of a republic that extended the voting franchise to women, was non-sectarian and claimed ownership of the resources of Ireland for the Irish people. It is fair to say that these principles remain the legitimately held aspirations of the great majority of Irish people today. They are what the Irish successfully fought for in the brilliantly executed guerrilla war that so inspired the 20the century colonies to do likewise; they are also the touchstone of legitimacy of the Irish state. One argument here is that this version of the state as it currently operates is therefore illegitimate

In 1918 an election was held under British law; Sinn Fein won over 70% of the seats. Instead of trotting off to Whitehall/London, they formed an autonomous parliament of the Irish republic as voted for by the people;


This assembly of the republic was proscribed by the British and its successor had a similarly anomalous being;


Eventually, after a bitterly fought civil war, the “free state” was created, the republic was not included,


Unlike the British, the Irish had a written constitution, edited by Whitehall



The classic republican argument is that the “free state” was created under threat of military invasion by Britain and that therefore the second Dail remains in existence as the legitimate government of Ireland, held in trust by the army council of the IRA until full elections again are held. . The Anglo-Irishman Richard Barton, who was one of the treaty negotiators and had no reason to lie, attested that such a threat was indeed uttered by Lloyd George, specifically “war within three days”

The “free state” made several attempts to resolve the situation before the capitulation that we are about to describe. One was the 1937 constitution; the other was the 1948 declaration of a republic, a declaration that was proscribed by the British in 1922 but would probably have averted the Civil war had it been done then. There possibly would have been less bloodshed on the island in the 70 subsequent years had this 1922 declaration taken place

A pathological dynamic, therefore has historically obtained. It started when the party that became Fianna fail set up what was effectively an internal government in exile after the civil war. They had government ministries in this fantasy league, unlike their successors from 1938 onwards, which were strictly military in effect. The first such, with impeccable timing, declared war on Britain in 1939; the subsequent 1950's border campaign was as bad.

Most recently. Gerry Adams' IRA renounced their claim on sovereignty and joined the parliament in both parts of Ireland. It is fair to suggest that the British patronage of Adams and his ilk was due to fear of Marxists like Seamus Costello with their more effective paramilitaries, rather than love of Gerry.


2. The nullification of Ireland's national territory

In 1937, on the eve of WW2, with an armed neighbor beside it staking claim over some of the same territory, and after centuries of genocide and dispossession, the Irish people voted for this simple proposition;

Article 2
The national territory consists of the whole island of Ireland, its islands and the territorial seas.”
In 1938, as we've seen, the IRA lost patience and claimed jurisdiction over the whole island in the name of the 1916 republic. This ended in the 1969-1997 disaster; what was to come, I argue, was the conscious destruction of the Irish people as an identifiable ethnic group; in short, cultural genocide. First, in an appallingly written document, the national territory was gotten rid of;




The new Article 2

“It is the entitlement and birthright of every person born in the island of Ireland, which includes its islands and seas, to be part of the Irish Nation. That is also the entitlement of all persons otherwise qualified in accordance with law to be citizens of Ireland. Furthermore, the Irish nation cherishes its special affinity with people of Irish ancestry living abroad who share its cultural identity and heritage.
The new Article 3
  1. It is the firm will of the Irish Nation, in harmony and friendship, to unite all the people who share the territory of the island of Ireland, in all the diversity of their identities and traditions, recognising that a united Ireland shall be brought about only by peaceful means with the consent of a majority of the people, democratically expressed, in both jurisdictions in the island. Until then, the laws enacted by the Parliament established by this Constitution shall have the like area and extent of application as the laws enacted by the Parliament[2] that existed immediately before the coming into operation of this Constitution.
  2. Institutions with executive powers and functions that are shared between those jurisdictions may be established by their respective responsible authorities for stated purposes and may exercise powers and functions in respect of all or any part of the island. “


So there was to be no national territory; power lay in new bodies with officials unelected locally allowed to lay down the law. Moreover, by 2004 article 2 was rejected by 80% of the electorate, who insisted - pace, Leopold Bloom - that Irishness was more than just being born there

3. A new republic and reconciliation tribunal

Consequently, we now have two claimants on the republic;

  1. The current internationally-accepted government, the successor to the “free state”
  2. The army council of the IRA, which is not recognized internationally and has few supporters even in Ireland

It is the thesis of this post that these claims have equal moral and political validity. Moreover, the Free state has become so inimical to the interests of Irish people that there a very strong argument for the declaration of a new republic, even before putting it to the Irish people as a political movement and a referendum.

International accreditation of the “free state” brings with it a heavy burden, both financial and political.In particular, we are told that we owe abut $100 billion; in effect, the terms post 1998 are those given to Germany by the allies after WW1 and WW2. 
What is being proposed here, therefore, is a tribunal subsequent to the coming into force of the constitution of the new republic that examines crimes committed against Ireland under the flag of the old republic. There is no doubt that the banksters who successfully sought to defraud the Irish exchequer in order to keep their scam going for just a few months longer should be in jail, nor is there any doubt that the “free state” will not prosecute them;


Nor is there any doubt that the succession of minsters (Burke, ahern and now Rabbitte) who have given away our fossil fuels are in violation of article 10 of the onstitution;

“All natural resources, including the air and all forms of potential energy, within the jurisdiction of the Parliament and Government established by this Constitution and all royalties and franchises within that jurisdiction belong to the State subject to all estates and interests therein for the time being lawfully vested in any person or body. “

Yet the situation is clearer still. This government sees itself as a tool of the international financial community, rather than an entity resolved to protect the Irish people, as Merkel is obliged to do. They foster massive emigration of the Irish, and immigration of unskilled foreigners. In particular, the minister for finance announced that we e took one for the team, where this team is clearly not Ireland;


The deputy PM reports details of internal party strategy to his manager in the Dublin US embassy. Small wonder they went on openly to try and teal Irish passports and refuse visas to leading Irish writers, as my (in press) “Ireland in crisis” shows;


The PM himself is frighteningly stupid, ignorant, and ill-advised;



More to the point, as I have copiously documented elsewhere, this version of the Irish state has suspended the rule of law as it suits to destroy Irish ethnic musicians, and put the universities outside any statutory control. My solution has been simple; create an alternative university and open science sites. Indeed, this should be the leitmotif; create alternative institutions using the web.

The Irish state attempts to control things using mechanisms that are pre-Gutenberg, let alone the internet. This colonial administration has in fact allowed Irish passports themselves to become unsafe as the Mossad developed an unhealthy obsessions with them. In fact, it produces nothing of any benefit to an intelligent and sensitive human being

Law is used in Ireland almost solely as an instrument to cement the grip of a self-appointed elite on power. In general, then, the impetus that gave the free state some traction on the notion of the republic and legality has been spent

Yet there is no point in redoing the IRA trick. What seems to make sense is to declare a new republic, and to abide by the laws of the free state in a minimal fashion. As Iceland has demonstrated with bands like “Of Monsters and Men”, there are massive opportunities for a resource-rich state like Ireland that frees itself from the death-grip of the banksters .

Saturday, July 13, 2013

Edward Snowden, Barrett Brown, Bradley Manning; restoring America's honor



It is at least plausible that we are living in a continued coup attempt by an international plutocracy/self-appointed elite. Their get-togethers are well-known; Davos, G8, G20 and so on. The methodology varies; military invasions have ended up in fiasco, but the idea of destroying the protections engendered through the Church congressional hearings in the 1970's has persisted. Remarkably, the team that surrounded the president as he defended Colby's spooks at the time – Rumsfeld, Cheney, Greenspan et al – staged a comeback for the brief ride to power of the neocons.

A second theme has been the financialization of the economy and the attempt to put finance on an irrevocable math basis. This too ended in fiasco in 2008; the response was to create a fictitious president from whole cloth – and if Obama is who he says he is I'll eat my Irish passport – and to sneak in massive subsidies to these failed enterprises, evict people from their homes, and allow Obama do his MLK impersonations to ensure wealthy liberal people still felt good about themselves. For the record, this Dow bubble will end before Jan 014 as china collapses. Then they will repeat the Obama trick

A thrid theme has been the sheer mediocrity – nay, incompetence in many cases – of this tide of “innovation”. Had facebook been presented to me as a junior thesis, I would have given it a bare pass; it would have failed as a senior thesis. It is a matter of public record that Zuckerberg got his initial $13 million funding from a CIA affiliate called Accel partners after he revealed a willingness to share passwords and other private info from these “dumb fucks” as he calls his 1 billion + members;

and what happened to myspace?

The "social network" movie may best be seen as disinformation with the Winkelvoss twins perhaps  used as scapegoats to provide a good  if inaccurate story.

 It is also a matter of public record that Google uses the ancient “Power method”, channeled through Katz ranking, for its page rank. It is also BS to posit that they “hooked 200 computers together" etc; in fact they used the same data repository as Yahoo before their unexpected rise. They too have been partly CIA-funded.  Larry Ellison's owm Wiki entry goes  "One of his projects was a database for the CIA, which he named "Oracle"' !As for Microsoft, check the  Guardian

they are all at it

Given how trivial most of these technologies are, even as small a country like Ireland can produce a competitor that guarantees privacy.

Finally, we come to the extreme violence with which the USA dispossessed the natives. The rest of the world is beginning to experience this, with theft of Irish passports (not edible but useful; see my “Ireland in Crisis” book, in press), combined with blocking off air space to presidents, spying on friendly countries, and much else being used by the spookocracy. Yet there are fatal flaws in their plan.

One is that government salaries are not high enough to hire the really good tech people. So they end up outsourcing the tech work to Stratfor, who do not have a chance against Anonymous et al; there is prima facie evidence that elements in the FBI helped Anonymous, perhaps fearing for their jobs. The second is the honesty, openness and decency that characterizes much of American society

Edward Snowden and Barrett Brown epitomize this; yet Bradley Manning, a tortured soul, has had the greatest impact. None have been offered due process in a country whose history of genocide requires that it must save itself by offering such. We finally found how we were being governed, and watched. They are just the first three; this system of government in the name of openness but actually steeped in deceit and invasion of privacy is unstable. I for one am very hopeful that we can change things.

It will probably be necessary for many of us to get out of the USA if our cars (or bikes in my case) start to malfunction like  Michael Hastings';

Attending Obama's inaugration does not help

Finally, I have little doubt that this harmless and obscure blog is being monitored. It is for the same reason as gmail keeps changing and Facebook is doing linguistics "research" to process text automatically ; overstaffing in the spookocracy as in these otherwise boring companies.


PS (Aug 2014)The  Dow is indeed down for this year. Do not follow this blog for investment advice!

QE ends this Fall.........

Saturday, July 6, 2013

We are the 99%...and the Irish government will ignore us, yet again

It is difficult to convey to those outside Ireland what exact role the Irish Times plays in Irish public life. There is a viewpoint that it shapes policy through the Labor party, the tail (8% in the latest poll) wagging the dog in government. Perhaps the best analogy is to consider the impact the NY Times might have had during its period of boosting the Iraq war had its circulation been 8 million, as distinct from 2 million with the wind behind it. In that vein, it is as well to mention that many of the IT's key staff are Americans from colleges in the boonies,

In my personal experience, the Irish Times has not hesitated to inflate property prices, boost the failed Medialab project, attack academic tenure, savage brilliant and well-meaning artists (two of whom - Pete A and Sean O Riada - died after attacks in the Times)  and libel at will. So it is quite a moment when one of its pet projects, the boosting of abortion, does not pass the smell test after it publishes repeated opinion polls stating that the Irish wanted abortion.

In particular, if 75% are for abortion as these "surveys" indicate,why is it that the pro-life people outnumbered the pro-abortion protesters 99+:1 even in the Times' garbled report;

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/approximately-35-000-join-dublin-anti-abortion-rally-1.1455537

It would be interesting to see what Times contacts have already lucrative contracts for harvesting of stem cells and so on from aborted fetuses. After all, the Times played a major role in condemning the Irish economy through its property supplement being backed by Op-ed cheerleaders giving "objective" analyses.

Finally, I repeat my hypothesis that the current onset of abortion mania arose from a botched  DIY abortion attempted on a female fetus by an Indian couple in Ireland, together with her parents, Should they proceed with the civil case, this will likely come out. There are currently 800,00 abortions of female fetuses per year in India, with an imbalance of (up to age 6 alone) fully 7 million more males than females.

One of the classical ways to get sepsis is through this procedure;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-induced_abortion

12/7/13 - another fine mess

The legislation just passed the lower house. For non-Irish readers, that may come as something of a relief. the Savita case cannot happen again, right? In fact, this legislation does not even pretend to tackle such cases; sepsis is still very poorly understood and thousands die of it every week in the USA


10th most prevalent cause of death

Ireland's new lawgives effect to a 1992 supreme court judgement that makes Kermit Gosnell's activities legal;

American Mengele


 If a woman, 9 months pregnant,  whose waters have broken can prove that she is "at risk' of suicide, the baby must be terminated. This is the case if as Gosnell charmingly put it, the baby can be walked to the bus stop

So what is going on? the government has lost 5 of its parlimantary party, including its brightest star Ms Creighton, and Fine Gael will lose more;

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/abortion-bill-passed-29413834.html

It is clear what happened; death of sympathetic Indian woman, stoke the flames, the usual lies in the irish times. But this legislation?

The most plausible explanation is that this is part of the secret programme for government, arranged with gilmore who is conveniently absent in the USA which, as wikileaks has shown gives him his instructions.

Finally, the supreme court in Ireland ruled a generation ago that , the north-eastern corner was part of the national territory; no effort was made to implement this, for some reason. In 1998, 97% of the people voted to have NO national territory............


PS From Isaacson's biography of Steve Jobs, who was adopted. P254;

"I'm glad I didn't end up as an abortion"

Jobs subsequently made friends with his biological mother



Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Science Foundation Ireland and the CIA

We are about to enter a period wherein there will be an epidemic of anti-American sentiment even among countries and individuals normally well-disposed to the USA. The cold war surveillance apparatus should have been attenuated from 1990; instead, it has metastasized into something used to spy on friends of the USA, as Germany is pointing out.

That's not my main concern here. It is rather a very odd coincidence between the stated goals of the CIA's tech outreach company (In-Q-tel) and Science Foundation Ireland (SFI). The latter was set up over a decade ago without any serious consultation   - particularly given the massive budget of about $1 billion. It is fair to say that SFI has been controversial; indeed there are schools of opinion that it is essentially an even more grotesque version of the Medilab debacle.

Why keep it going? Let's look at its foci per

http://www.sfi.ie/about/

essentially they are  biotech and info tech.

These are precisely the same as the CIA's off shoot;

http://www.iqt.org/portfolio/practices.html


with the proviso that energy will be handled by the DOE

The apparently insane and wasteful behavior by successive Irish govts now makes some sense; it is less mad than evil

For the record, this is an open science model which I think should be adopted in Ireland, both as an education program that all science  PhD  students should do and as a general open science approach with a list of the resources appended;

http://universityofireland.com/m-sc-in-interdisciplinary-studies/



  • Biotechnology (BIO)
  • Information and communications technology (ICT)
  • Sustainable energy and energy-efficient technologies (ENERGY)
  • - See more at: http://www.sfi.ie/about/#sthash.ThHnkAUb.dpuf

  • Biotechnology (BIO)
  • Information and communications technology (ICT)
  • Sustainable energy and energy-efficient technologies (ENERGY)
  • - See more at: http://www.sfi.ie/about/#sthash.ThHnkAUb.dpuf

  • Biotechnology (BIO)
  • Information and communications technology (ICT)
  • Sustainable energy and energy-efficient technologies (ENERGY)
  • - See more at: http://www.sfi.ie/about/#sthash.ThHnkAUb.dpuf